Aprel Prunty, Alderman - Ward 6 | City of Rockford
Aprel Prunty, Alderman - Ward 6 | City of Rockford
City of Rockford Zoning Board of Appeals met June 17.
Here are the minutes provided by the board:
Present:
ZBA Members:
Joel Zirkle
Tom Fabiano
Kim Johnsen
Craig Sockwell
Absent: Jennifer Spencer
Jennifer Smith
Staff: Scott Capovilla - Planning and Zoning Manager
Jeremy Carter – Traffic & Development Engineer
Jacob Rubin – Assistant City Attorney
Emil Mosny - Fire Prevention
Traci Madison – Administrative Assistant
Others: Sarah Leys – Community and Economic Development Director
Mark Bonne – 14th Ward Alderman
Kyaton Shanklin - Court Stenographer
Applicants and interested parties
Scott Capovilla, Planning & Zoning Manager, explained the format of the meeting will follow the Boards Rules of Procedure generally outlined as follows:
• The Chair will call the address of the application.
• The Applicant or Representative will come forward and be sworn in.
• The Applicant or representative will present their request to the Board.
• The Board will ask any questions they may have regarding this application.
• The Chairman will then ask if there are any Objectors or Interested Parties. Objectors or Interested Parties are to come forward at that time, be sworn in by the Chairman, and give their name to the Zoning Board of Appeals secretary and the court reporter.
• The Objector or Interested Party will state their name and present all their concerns, objections and questions regarding the application.
• The Board will ask any questions they may have of the Objector or Interested Party.
• The Applicant will have an opportunity to rebut the concerns/questions raised by the Objector or Interested Party.
• No further discussion from the Objector or Interested Party will occur after the rebuttal of the Applicant.
• The Board will ask any final questions they may have regarding this application.
• The Board will then deliberate and a roll call vote taken.
The ZBA meeting is not a final vote on any item. However, it is the only time in which the public may participate. After the ZBA meeting, the item moves on to the Code & Regulation Committee. Although, the public is invited to attend the meeting, public input is not allowed at the committee meeting. The date of the Code & Regulation meeting will be Monday, June 23, 2025 at 5:30 PM in City Council Chambers (2nd floor of City Hall) as the second vote on these items. The third and final meeting in this process is the City Council. That vote is tentatively scheduled Monday, July 7, 2025 5:30 PM. If the item is laid over at the ZBA meeting, the next meeting is Tuesday, July 15, 2025. If for any reason the item is laid over at the committee level or on the City Council floor, the item is automatically laid over for two (2) weeks.
The meeting was called to order at 5:38 P.M.
A MOTION was made by Joel Zirkle to APPROVE the May 20, 2025 meeting minutes. The motion was SECONDED by Craig Sockwell and CARRIED by a vote of 3-0-1 with Tom Fabiano abstaining.
ZBA 016-25 3154 McFarland Road
Applicant Woodman’s Food Market, Inc.
Ward 4 Special Use Permit for an off-premise landmark style sign and a Variation to allow three (3) free-standing signs in a C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District
The Applicant requested a layover
A MOTION was made by Tom Fabiano to LAYOVER a Special Use Permit for an off-premise landmark style sign and a Variation to allow three (3) free-standing signs in a C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District. The motion was SECONDED by Joel Zirkle and CARRIED by a vote of 4-0
ZBA 017-25 602 North Madison Street
Applicant Becky Haddad for Mary’s Place
Ward 3 Special Use Permit for a mural on the south side building wall in a C-4, Urban Mixed-Use Zoning District
Jason Haddad was present. Mr. Haddad spoke on behalf of the Applicant, Becky Haddad, the owner of Mary’s Place. Mr. Haddad stated this request is for a Special Use Permit for a mural that would be painted by a local artist and to pay respect to Mary’s Place being the oldest bar in the City of Rockford.
No Objectors or Interested parties were present.
Staff recommendation is for approval.
A MOTION was made by Craig Sockwell to APPROVE a Special Use Permit for a mural on the south side building wall in a C-4, Urban Mixed-Use Zoning District. The motion was SECONDED Joel Zirkle and CARRIED by a vote of 4-0.
Approval is based on the following conditions:
1. A sign permit shall be required including mural elevation shall be submitted with the permit application.
2. The mural panels may not consist of a vinyl banner material within a frame. 3. The mural must be maintained to meet code.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A MURAL ON A BUILDING IN A C-4, URBAN MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 602 NORTH MADISON STREET
Approval of this Special Use Permit is based upon the following findings:
1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Special Use Permit will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community.
2. The Special Use Permit will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, and will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal or orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district.
4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been, are being, or will be provided.
5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets.
6. The special use shall conform to the applicable regulations of the C-4 District in which it is located.
ZBA 018-25 5918 Elaine Drive
Applicant Welcome Home Residency, Inc.
Ward 14 Zoning Map Amendment from C-1, Limited Office Zoning District to R-3, Multi-family Residential Zoning District and a Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for four (4), 3-units and three (3), 4-units in an R-3, Multi family Residential Zoning District
Raven Ross and Jeff Meyers were present. Ms. Ross spoke on behalf of the Applicant and stated the applicant is proposing to build luxury condos on this property. Mr. Meyers is the architect for this project and he discussed the site plan layouts of the proposed three and four bedroom, multi-family condos which will consist of a parking area, a pool, a 2-car garage for each unit and will be in a gated community.
Tom Fabiano asked what the rent amount would be for the units. Ms. Ross answered the amount for rent has not been established yet. Mr. Meyers said approximately three thousand for each unit.
Interested parties were present.
Keith Wells is a neighborhood resident. Mr. Wells stated he lives at 5809 Elaine Drive. Mr. Wells had several questions he was unsure of the site plans showing entering and exiting the development, asked if the units would be available to Section 8 recipients, would the swimming pool affect the environment of the neighborhood, and if the property value and property taxes would increase.
Charlene Kevern is a neighborhood resident. Ms. Kevern expressed the concern of increased traffic, and the size capacity of the units being built.
14th Ward Alderman Mark Bonne spoke on behalf of the 14th Ward. Alderman Bonne said he is in support of this project but would like clarity as to the plans of the project. Alderman Bonne’s knowledge of the plan design consisted of three bedroom condos but indicated the developer had disclosed to him an interest in limiting the design to two bedroom units. He said the idea of condos would be great but the size capacity as Ms. Kevern previously mentioned would be of concern. Alderman Bonne expressed the project is a great idea he likes the concept but would want the plans to be better defined.
Ms. Ross confirmed the housing units will be condos. Mr. Meyers spoke to the concerns mentioned by Mr. Wells and Ms. Kevern. The development will have a key pad access to enter and exit the development, the pool is in the back of the property where no neighbors can see or hear. He also stated the landscaping plans will be finalized after the approval of this request and will be compliant with the City of Rockford’s ordinances. Mr. Meyers said the property value of the neighborhood will increase due to the design and the value of these units. Although the proposal is for three bedrooms units, the owner could be open to some of the units being two bedrooms. Mr. Meyers stated the size capacity of the units as far as density does not exceed the City of Rockford’s ordinances.
Ms. Johnsen read emails from neighborhood residents Jennie Picchi and Cathy Edwards at 5921 Elaine Drive and the Haney Family residing at 5923 Elaine Drive.
Staff recommendation is for approval.
A MOTION was made by Craig Sockwell to APPROVE a Zoning Map Amendment from C-1, Limited Office Zoning District to R-3, Multi-family Residential Zoning District and a Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development for four (4), 3-units and three (3), 4-units in an R-3, Multi-family Residential Zoning District. The motion was SECONDED by Joel Zirkle and CARRIED by a vote of 4-0
Approval is based on the following conditions:
1. Must meet all applicable building and fire codes.
2. Submittal of a civil engineering plan for staff’s review and approval.
3. Submittal of a stormwater management plan for staff’s review and approval.
4. The development will require two (2) hydrants to be placed in locations approved by the Fire Department.
5. Submittal of a detailed landscape plan for staff’s review and approval.
6. Submittal of Planned Unit Development final plat for staff’s review and approval.
7. Must develop buildings in accordance with proposed elevations submitted as Exhibit G.
8. All conditions must be met prior to establishment of use.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FROM c-1, Limited Office zoning district to R-3, multi-family residential zoning district LOCATED AT 5918 ELAINE DRIVE
Approval of this Zoning Map Amendment is based upon the following findings:
1). The proposed Zoning Map change is consistent with Article II, Intent and Purpose, of the Rockford Zoning Ordinance for the following reasons:
a. This proposal promotes the health, safety, comfort, convenience, morals and general welfare for the citizens of Rockford because it is consistent with the comprehensive plan and surrounding uses;
b. This proposal protects the character, scale and stability of the residential because the proposed development will meet all development requirements of this site; and
c. The proposed map amendment would allow for a reasonable development to take place consistent with the zoning district.
2). The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the approved general plan
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR FOUR (4), 3-UNIT BUILDINGS AND THREE (3), 4-UNIT BUILDINGS IN AN R-3, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 5918 ELAINE DRIVE
Approval of this Special Use Permit is based upon the following findings:
1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the Special Use Permit will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the community.
2. The Special Use Permit will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, and will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal or orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the R-3 Districts.
4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been provided.
5. Adequate measures have been taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets.
6. The special use does conform to the applicable regulations of the R-3 District in which it is located.
ZBA 019-25 7475 East State Street
Applicant Smart Signs, Inc. for Machine Shed, LLC
Ward 1 Variation to reduce the sight-triangle setback from the required 20 feet to 18 feet in a C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District and C-3, General Commercial Zoning District
Jeff Jacobs was present. Mr. Jacobs is employed with Smart Signs, Inc. Mr. Jacobs stated this variance request is to reduce the site triangle setback from the required 20 feet to 18 feet to place a new monument sign on the southeast corner of this property located at 7475 East State Street.
Interested parties were present.
Guy Deserio is the COO of the Machine Shed. Mr. Deserio said he has been employed 29 years with the Machine Shed. He said the proposed new sign would enhance business and stated the old sign would be removed. Mr. Deserio asked for consideration for approval of this request.
Craig Sockwell asked Planning and Zoning Manager Scott Capovilla if the sign was moved would this change staff’s recommendation. Mr. Capovilla stated that staff will continue with past practices. However, if this request is approved, he stated a condition should be added that the existing freestanding sign to the west be removed.
Ms. Johnsen stated she believes there is a hardship involving this request and would consider approval of this request.
Staff recommendation is for denial.
A MOTION was made by Tom Fabiano to APPROVE a Variation to reduce the sight-triangle setback from the required 20 feet to 18 feet in a C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District and C 3, General Commercial Zoning District. The motion was SECONDED by Joel Zirkle and CARRIED by a vote of 4-0.
Approval is based on the following condition:
1. Removal of the existing freestanding sign located at the west entrance.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL TO FOR A VARIATION TO REDUCE THE SIGHT-TRIANGLE SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 20 FEET TO 18 FEET IN A C-2, LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND C-3, GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7475 EAST STATE STREET
Approval of this Variation is based upon the following findings:
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out.
2. The conditions upon which a petition for this Variation are based are unique to the property for which the Variation is sought and are applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification.
3. The purpose of this Variation is based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the property.
4. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently having an interest in the property or by any predecessor in title.
5. The granting of this Variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located.
6. The proposed Variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair the property values within the neighborhood.
7. The proposed Variation does comply with the spirit and intent of restrictions imposed by this Ordinance.
ZBA 020-25 6507, 6557, 6597, 65XX, 6640, 6660, 66XX, 6730, 6770, 6783, and 6819 Fincham Drive, 886 and 891 White Chapel Lane, 6785 Mill Road and 9XX Highgrove Place
Applicant FLVS, LLC for AC Johnston/William Charles Real Estate Investment, LLC
Ward 1 Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development consisting of sixty-eight (68) single-story duplexes, sixty (60) two-story duplexes and fifty-two (52) two story, four unit buildings in a C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District
Luke Salamone and Nicholas Becker were present. Mr. Salamone stated he is speaking on the behalf of Fred Van Fleet, his business partner. This request is for a Special Use Permit that will support the urgent need for additional housing in the City of Rockford. This project will provide high quality and affordable housing options for families, seniors and singles with a wide range of rental rates that will be conducive for various income levels and with top of the line management. Mr. Becker is the civil engineer and he said there is City of Rockford water and Four Rivers Sanitation sewer currently located on or adjacent to this sites. He also indicated that the site is zoned C-2 and that any additional traffic will be less than most commercial uses.
Objectors or Interested parties were present.
Eric Bruno is neighborhood resident. Mr. Bruno resides at 930 Stonefield Lane and is speaking on behalf of the neighbors in the area. Mr. Bruno asked how long construction will last and will the project be completed in phases. He is concerned with flooding, particular with Fincham Drive, the lack of sidewalks across from the senior living facility, and emergency vehicle access.
Mr. Bruno also wants to know what type of landscaping and trees will be installed, the price of rent and if there will be subsidized housing. He is also concerned with more crime, if they will have rent criteria and who will be responsible for managing these properties when construction has been completed.
Jim Benbennick is a neighborhood resident. Mr. Benbennick lives at 6614 North Point Road and he said he was in agreement with the questions Mr. Bruno previously asked. Mr. Benbennick also has concerns with increased traffic.
Jose Torres is a neighborhood resident. Mr. Torres lives at 931 White Chapel Lane and has concerns with the number of units, if the property value and taxes will increase, and the increase in traffic.
Yolanda Bozek is a neighborhood resident. Ms. Bozek lives at 949 White Chapel Lane and has concerns with smelling garbage, location of dumpsters, a crowded neighborhood and heavy traffic.
Ms. Johnsen read an email from Shawn and Shannon Kelley who are neighborhood residents and reside at 923 White Chapel Lane. Their concerns are safety and privacy, possibly having some kind of retaining wall, the increase in traffic, increased property values and taxes, and if the construction area will be protected.
Ms. Johnsen also read an email from Jasmine Elkhabiry and Ihsan Abualia who reside at 979 White Chapel Lane. Their concern is if this project will be designated as low-income, income restricted or subsidized housing. They also wanted to know if their property taxes will increase and are concerned with the local traffic flow.
Mr. Salamone thanked everyone for their concerns. He said construction will begin this year and completion is set for 2027. He stated that the rental rates proposed starting at $1,200 for one bedroom and $2,000 for two and three bedrooms. He said that property values will change due to the design and quality of the proposed units. He also stated that the property will be managed by Mr. Salamone’s and Mr. Van Vleet’s management company, who manages their existing properties. Mr. Salamone said the concern regarding the garbage would not be a concern as the garbage cans will remain in the garage and not in public view. There would not be any dumpsters. Mr. Salamone concluded that traffic will be less than what it could be as this property is zoned commercial and the proposal is for residential. Mr. Becker will design the private roads within the property to allow for emergency vehicle access and will be in compliance with the fire equipment requirement. He also stated that public sidewalks will be a part of this project. The construction equipment should adhere to the City of Rockford’s right of way and dust control will be in compliance with the City of Rockford’s ordinances. Mr. Becker said no retaining walls are required and an overall landscaping plan will be a part of the Special Use Permit approval requirement.
Mr. Sockwell and Mr. Zirkle both agree that this proposed project is a good idea and would support approval for this request.
A MOTION was made by Joel Zirkle to APPROVE a Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development consisting of sixty-eight (68) single-story duplexes, sixty (60) two-story duplexes and fifty-two (52) two-story, four unit buildings in a C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District. The motion was SECONDED by Craig Sockwell and CARRIED by a vote of 4-0.
Approval is based on the following conditions
1. Must meet all applicable Building and Fire codes.
2. Submittal of a civil engineering plan for staff’s review and approval.
3. Submittal of a stormwater management plan for staff’s review and approval.
4. Submittal of an overall landscaping plan for staff’s review and approval prior to issuance building permits.
5. Submittal of an internal pedestrian circulation plan for staff’s review and approval.
6. Submittal of building elevations for each model for staff’s review and approval prior to issuance of a building permits.
7. Submittal of interior floor plans for each model for staff’s review and approval prior to issuance of a building permits.
8. Submittal of Planned Unit Development final plat for staff’s review and approval.
9. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all development improvements must be completed including public sidewalks.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF SIXTY-EIGHT (68) SINGLE-STORY DUPLEXES, SIXTY (60) TWO-STORY DUPLEXES AND FIFTY-TWO (52) TWO-STORY FOUR-UNIT BUILDINGS IN A C-2, LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRIC LOCATED AT 6507, 6557, 6597, 65XX, 6640, 6660, 66XX, 6730, 6770, 6783,AND 6819 FINCHAM DRIVE, 886 AND 891 WHITE CHAPEL LANE 6785 MILL ROAD AND 9XX HIGHGROVE PLACE
Approval of this Special Use Permit is based upon the following findings:
1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the Special Use Permit will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the community.
2. The Special Use Permit will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, and will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal or orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district.
4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been, are being, or will be provided.
5. Adequate measures have not been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets.
6. The special use does conform to the applicable regulations of the C-2 Districts in which it is located.
ZBA 021-25 1923 12th Avenue
Applicant Attorney John Gilbert for Paresh Kumar
Ward 2 Zoning Map Amendment from R-1, Single family Residential Zoning District to R-2, Two-family Residential Zoning District
Attorney John Gilbert spoke on behalf of the Applicant, Paresh Kumar. Attorney Gilbert stated this request is for the current zoning to be amended from R1, Single-family Residential to R2, Two-family Residential. The property was purchased eight years ago as a two-family residence and is currently being occupied as a two family residence.
Mr. Zirkle asked Attorney Gilbert if the Applicant had researched the property before purchasing it. Attorney Gilbert answered he did not know the Applicant at the time of the purchase. Mr. Zirkle indicated he was not in favor of spot zoning.
No Objectors or Interested parties were present.
Staff recommendation is for denial
A MOTION was made by Craig Sockwell to DENY a Zoning Map Amendment from R-1, Single family Residential Zoning District to R-2, Two-family Residential Zoning District. The motion was SECONDED by Joel Zirkle and CARRIED by a vote of 4-0.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENTFROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 1923 12TH AVENUE
Denial of this Zoning Map Amendment is based upon the following findings:
1). The proposed Zoning Map change is not consistent with Article II, Intent and Purpose, of the Rockford Zoning Ordinance for the following reasons:
a. This proposal promotes the health, safety, comfort, convenience, morals and general welfare for the citizens of Rockford because it is consistent with the comprehensive plan and surrounding uses;
b. This proposal protects the character, scale and stability of the residential because the proposed development will meet all development requirements of this site; and
c. The proposed map amendment would not allow consistent with the zoning district and is considered spot zoning.
2). The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is not consistent with the approved general plan of RL, Low Residential.
ZBA 022-25 4528 Nevard Boulevard
Applicant Corral Dyn, LLC
Ward 3 Zoning Map Amendment from C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District to R 2, Two-family Residential Zoning District and a Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development consisting of five (5), two-family structures in an R-2, Two-family Residential Zoning District
Attorney Cassandra Crandall spoke on behalf of the Applicant, Corral Dyn, LLC. Attorney Crandall stated this property currently has 18 duplexes and this request is to amend the zoning district from C-2, Limited Commercial to R-2, Two-family Residential to add 5, two-family structures. This will be done via the Planned Unit Development.
No Objectors or Interested parties were present.
Ms. Johnsen read an email received from Kathy Ressler a neighborhood resident. Ms. Ressler has concerns regarding an increase in traffic in the area, possible flooding, an increase in crime, and wondered how many bedrooms would be in each of the five structures. Attorney Crandall stated these structures are 2 and 3 bedrooms structures and are designed for one family per unit.
Staff recommendation is for approval.
A MOTION was made by Craig Sockwell to APPROVE a Zoning Map Amendment from C-2, Limited Commercial Zoning District to R-2, Two-family Residential Zoning District and a Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development consisting of five (5), two-family structures in an R-2, Two-family Residential Zoning District. The motion was SECONDED by Joel Zirkle and CARRIED by a vote of 4-0.
Approval is based on the following conditions:
1. Must be constructed in accordance with submitted Exhibit D.
2. Must meet all applicable Building and Fire codes.
3. A Final Plat must be recorded prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Submittal of a landscaping plan for staff’s review and approval prior to issuance building permits.
5. Submittal of the building elevation for staff’s review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
6. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all development improvements must be completed including sidewalks damaged during construction.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL OF A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FROM C-2, LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 4528 NEVARD BOULEVARD
Approval of this Zoning Map Amendment is based upon the following findings:
1). The proposed Zoning Map change is consistent with Article II, Intent and Purpose, of the Rockford Zoning Ordinance for the following reasons:
a. This proposal promotes the health, safety, comfort, convenience, morals and general welfare for the citizens of Rockford because it is consistent with the comprehensive plan and surrounding uses;
b. This proposal protects the character, scale and stability of the residential because the proposed development will meet all development requirements of this site; and
c. The proposed map amendment would allow for a reasonable development to take place consistent with the zoning district.
2). The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the approved general plan.
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF FIVE (5), TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN AN R-2, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 4528 NEVARD BOULEVARD
Approval of this Special Use Permit is based upon the following findings:
1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the Special Use Permit will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the community.
2. The Special Use Permit will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, and will substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal or orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the R-2 District.
4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been provided.
5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets.
6. The special use shall conform to the applicable regulations of the R-2 District in which it is located.
Meeting adjourned at 7:08 pm
http://rockfordcityil.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=12&ID=2785&Inline=True
Alerts Sign-up